sscfi and other Expert systems often make mistakes.
Q: is a mistake always easy to recognize by a human?
A: usually yes for sscfi
q: example of an obvious mistake in sccfi?
A: wrong diagnosis
Q: what other mistakes?
A: slowness
Q: How do u reduce recurring mistakes?
A: reviews by human experts
Q: how many such reviews each month?
A: about 1/day
My main blog
Labels
_fuxi
(75)
_IV
(146)
_misc
(5)
{610610
(30)
algo
(1)
automatedTrading
(8)
banking/economy
(3)
book
(14)
c++misc
(125)
c++real
(15)
c++STL/java_container
(7)
cppTemplate
(1)
db
(13)
DB_tuning
(4)
deepUnder
(1)
dotnet
(69)
eTip
(17)
excelVBA
(12)
finance+sys
(34)
financeMisc
(24)
financeRisk
(2)
financeTechMisc
(4)
financeVol
(21)
finmath
(17)
fixedIncome
(25)
forex
(16)
IDE
(24)
invest
(1)
java
(43)
latency
(4)
LinearAlgebra
(3)
math
(30)
matlab
(24)
memoryMgmt
(11)
metaPrograming
(2)
MOM
(15)
msfm
(1)
murex
(4)
nofx
(11)
nosql
(3)
OO_Design
(1)
original_content
(4)
scriptUnixAutosys
(19)
SOA
(7)
socket/stream
(15)
sticky
(1)
subquery+join
(2)
swing
(32)
sybase
(6)
tech_orphan
(12)
tech+fin_career
(30)
telco
(11)
thread
(21)
timeSaver
(13)
tune
(10)
US_imm
(2)
US_misc
(2)
windoz
(20)
z_algo+dataStructure
(4)
z_arch
(2)
z_c#GUI
(30)
z_career
(10)
z_career]US^Asia
(2)
z_careerBig20
(1)
z_careerFinanceTech
(11)
z_FIX
(6)
z_forex
(31)
z_hib
(2)
z_ikm
(7)
z_inMemDB
(3)
z_j2ee
(10)
z_oq
(14)
z_php
(1)
z_py
(26)
z_quant
(4)
z_skillist
(3)
z_spr
(5)
