Now I think BM with drift is easier to deal with than GBM -- with or without drift.
For a BM with drift, the position at a future time T has a familiar normal distribution. The next increment (+ve or –ve), too, has a normal distribution.
The GBM has a asymmetric bell shape. Harder to visualize.
My main blog
Labels
_fuxi
(75)
_IV
(146)
_misc
(5)
{610610
(30)
algo
(1)
automatedTrading
(8)
banking/economy
(3)
book
(14)
c++misc
(125)
c++real
(15)
c++STL/java_container
(7)
cppTemplate
(1)
db
(13)
DB_tuning
(4)
deepUnder
(1)
dotnet
(69)
eTip
(17)
excelVBA
(12)
finance+sys
(34)
financeMisc
(24)
financeRisk
(2)
financeTechMisc
(4)
financeVol
(21)
finmath
(17)
fixedIncome
(25)
forex
(16)
IDE
(24)
invest
(1)
java
(43)
latency
(4)
LinearAlgebra
(3)
math
(30)
matlab
(24)
memoryMgmt
(11)
metaPrograming
(2)
MOM
(15)
msfm
(1)
murex
(4)
nofx
(11)
nosql
(3)
OO_Design
(1)
original_content
(4)
scriptUnixAutosys
(19)
SOA
(7)
socket/stream
(15)
sticky
(1)
subquery+join
(2)
swing
(32)
sybase
(6)
tech_orphan
(12)
tech+fin_career
(30)
telco
(11)
thread
(21)
timeSaver
(13)
tune
(10)
US_imm
(2)
US_misc
(2)
windoz
(20)
z_algo+dataStructure
(4)
z_arch
(2)
z_c#GUI
(30)
z_career
(10)
z_career]US^Asia
(2)
z_careerBig20
(1)
z_careerFinanceTech
(11)
z_FIX
(6)
z_forex
(31)
z_hib
(2)
z_ikm
(7)
z_inMemDB
(3)
z_j2ee
(10)
z_oq
(14)
z_php
(1)
z_py
(26)
z_quant
(4)
z_skillist
(3)
z_spr
(5)